Ddition, itit is found that when the damaged hanger is in a symmetrical position, the Pinacidil Purity damage results are not absolutely symmetrical, which should really be as a result of position, the harm benefits usually are not fully symmetrical, which must be resulting from the the fact that it really is impossible to ensure that the state state of each damage condition is truth that it really is not possible to make sure that the initial initialof each and every harm condition is comcompletely consistent for the duration of the test. be observed observed the test outcomes that that irrespective of pletely constant through the test. It canIt could be from in the test resultsregardless of your the location of your damage the number of of damaged hangers, the proposed approach location from the damage andand the number thethe broken hangers, the proposed technique can always reliably locate the damaged hangers. can often reliably locate the broken hangers.4.four. Experimental Verification of Hanger Harm Identification Thinking about Creep and Bridge 4.four. Experimental Verification of Hanger Harm Identification Contemplating Creep and Bridge Stiffness Degradation Stiffness Degradation As analyzed above, each creep and all round stiffness degradation could be performed As analyzed above, both creep and overall stiffness degradation is usually performed by decreasing the modulus of elasticity inside the numerical simulation. The GYY4137 site preset damage by decreasing the modulus of elasticity in the numerical simulation. The preset damage cable for single cable damage conditions was S3, along with the damage degree was 12.5 , 25 , cable for single cable damage situations was S3, along with the damage degree was 12.5 , 25 , 37.five, and 50 , respectively; the preset damage cable for double cable harm conditions 37.5, and 50 , respectively; the preset harm cable for double cable harm situations was S3 and S7, and the damage degree was also set to 12.5 , 25 , 37.five and 50 , and the was S3 and S7, as well as the damagein Figure 15. also set to 12.five , 25 , 37.5 and 50 , and the recognition benefits are shown degree was recognition final results are shown in Figure 15.rcerce2.0 1.eight 1.12.five 25 37.52.two two.0 1.eight 1.12.5 25 37.5Appl. Sci. 2021, 11,As analyzed above, each creep and overall stiffness degradation could be performed by decreasing the modulus of elasticity within the numerical simulation. The preset harm cable for single cable harm circumstances was S3, and the damage degree was 12.5 , 25 , 37.five, and 50 , respectively; the preset harm cable for double cable harm conditions was S3 and S7, as well as the harm degree was also set to 12.five , 25 , 37.5 and 50 , and 14 of 16 the recognition final results are shown in Figure 15.two.0 1.eight 1.6 1.four 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.six 0.4 0.two 0.0 -0.2 -0.four -0.6 -0.SSSSSSSSSRatio modify in cable forceRatio adjust in cable force12.five 25 37.five 502.two 2.0 1.eight 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.six 0.four 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.six -0.12.five 25 37.5 50SSSSSSSSSHanger numberHanger number(a)(b)Figure 15. 15. Model test identification benefits considering creep andand stiffness degradation:the the Figure Model test identification outcomes for for thinking about creep stiffness degradation: (a) (a) preset damage hanger is S3; S3; (b) the preset harm hangers are S3 and S7. preset damage hanger is (b) the preset damage hangers are S3and S7.It can be be seen from Figure 15 that the strategy proposed this paper can accurately It may observed from Figure 15 that the approach proposed in within this paper can accurately find thethe broken hanger when considering creep and overall stiffness degradation. find damaged hanger when.