S after induction. The graphs of quantified transcript levels after various pHs induction (A ) and different NaCl concentrations induction (E ). Gene expression is quantified using qRT-PCR and the comparative critical threshold (2DDCT) method. 22948146 The rpoB gene was used as the endogenous reference, while the expression in the control sample (I-BRD9 chemical information without pyrene substrate) was used as the calibrator. Two independent experiments were performed. Vertical bars indicate means from standard deviations of triplicate qRT-PCR analyses. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058066.gtion [40]. The determination of an internal control preceded the qRT-PCR study as Ginzinger [33], Vandecasteele [31] and Vandesompele et al. [32] had suggested, in order to get 
an accurate quantification of the transcripts. There is no consensus for prokaryotic internal control genes unlike the eukaryotes with known house-keeping genes such as GADPH and beta actin genes. Therefore, the transcript level of four postulated house-keeping genes were quantified in nine conditions of pH and salinity changes. Most studies use the rrs gene for quantification studies but the 16S rRNA gene is not the best representative of the mRNA fraction since the rRNA molecules is about 95 of the whole RNA mass. This will evidently bring about a biased quantification of the expressed genes. Also, our quest for the best internal control gene revealed the highly unstable expression of the rrs gene in the experimental conditions (Fig. 2). Therefore, instead of using the classical rrs gene, we opted for rpoB gene which was averagely stable in all the conditions tested compared to all the other internal control gene candidates. The qRT-PCR method was used to study the transcript levels of the four aromatic ring-cleaving dioxygenase gene activities in the M.114311-32-9 chemical information gilvum PYR-GCK strain. This study has shown significant expression activity of the tested genes at the various conditions and a marked correlation has been observed between the residual pyrene analysis and the gene expression study. This is the first gene-expression research of this nature in pyrene degradation studies and more so in any pyrene degrading bacterial strain. Proteomic gene expression studies have been done in various bacterial strains. In the Mycobacterium genus, a study on M. vanbaalenii PYR-1 [25] showed the expression of these aromatic ring-cleaving dioxygenases during pyrene induction. The report showed an expression level of 3.4 fold in PhdI, pyrene-only expression of the PhdF protein, down regulated (0.5) protein expression of the PcaG and a 1.6 fold expression of the PcaH protein; all calibrated with a sorbitol-induced protein expression. An earlier proteome expression study on M.gilvum PYR-GCK [20], showed similar results with PhdF and PhdI solely expressedin the pyrene induced cells, the PcaG protein weakly upregulated in the pyrene induced cells and PcaH protein 2.9 fold up-regulated in the pyrene induced cells; all calibrated with a glucose-induced protein expression. Our research probably used a starving set of M.gilvum PYR-GCK strains, without any source of carbon or energy, in calibration. None of the previous studies were in any way based on the conditions listed in our research but instead their studies were all carried 
out at optimal conditions of pH 7.0 and 0 M salinity. This was the conditional basis of our calibration sample, equipped with null substrate for zero induction. The results we acquired from our study echoed a similar p.S after induction. The graphs of quantified transcript levels after various pHs induction (A ) and different NaCl concentrations induction (E ). Gene expression is quantified using qRT-PCR and the comparative critical threshold (2DDCT) method. 22948146 The rpoB gene was used as the endogenous reference, while the expression in the control sample (without pyrene substrate) was used as the calibrator. Two independent experiments were performed. Vertical bars indicate means from standard deviations of triplicate qRT-PCR analyses. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058066.gtion [40]. The determination of an internal control preceded the qRT-PCR study as Ginzinger [33], Vandecasteele [31] and Vandesompele et al. [32] had suggested, in order to get an accurate quantification of the transcripts. There is no consensus for prokaryotic internal control genes unlike the eukaryotes with known house-keeping genes such as GADPH and beta actin genes. Therefore, the transcript level of four postulated house-keeping genes were quantified in nine conditions of pH and salinity changes. Most studies use the rrs gene for quantification studies but the 16S rRNA gene is not the best representative of the mRNA fraction since the rRNA molecules is about 95 of the whole RNA mass. This will evidently bring about a biased quantification of the expressed genes. Also, our quest for the best internal control gene revealed the highly unstable expression of the rrs gene in the experimental conditions (Fig. 2). Therefore, instead of using the classical rrs gene, we opted for rpoB gene which was averagely stable in all the conditions tested compared to all the other internal control gene candidates. The qRT-PCR method was used to study the transcript levels of the four aromatic ring-cleaving dioxygenase gene activities in the M.gilvum PYR-GCK strain. This study has shown significant expression activity of the tested genes at the various conditions and a marked correlation has been observed between the residual pyrene analysis and the gene expression study. This is the first gene-expression research of this nature in pyrene degradation studies and more so in any pyrene degrading bacterial strain. Proteomic gene expression studies have been done in various bacterial strains. In the Mycobacterium genus, a study on M. vanbaalenii PYR-1 [25] showed the expression of these aromatic ring-cleaving dioxygenases during pyrene induction. The report showed an expression level of 3.4 fold in PhdI, pyrene-only expression of the PhdF protein, down regulated (0.5) protein expression of the PcaG and a 1.6 fold expression of the PcaH protein; all calibrated with a sorbitol-induced protein expression. An earlier proteome expression study on M.gilvum PYR-GCK [20], showed similar results with PhdF and PhdI solely expressedin the pyrene induced cells, the PcaG protein weakly upregulated in the pyrene induced cells and PcaH protein 2.9 fold up-regulated in the pyrene induced cells; all calibrated with a glucose-induced protein expression. Our research probably used a starving set of M.gilvum PYR-GCK strains, without any source of carbon or energy, in calibration. None of the previous studies were in any way based on the conditions listed in our research but instead their studies were all carried out at optimal conditions of pH 7.0 and 0 M salinity. This was the conditional basis of our calibration sample, equipped with null substrate for zero induction. The results we acquired from our study echoed a similar p.