Al criteria and shows how Web pages two and 3 could continue inside the
Al criteria and shows how Websites 2 and 3 could continue in the assessment as they met all vital criteria.Table 1. A table of your crucial criteria based on which all candidate websites will be evaluated separately and an instance of how the sites may be excluded or move on together with the assessment (own elaboration). Website 1 Accessibility 3D model Infrastructure to host the apps Tourism infrastructure Access towards the area Other attractions Diving centers x x x x Web page 2 Site 3 SiteThe critical criteria would narrow down the candidate internet sites as observed on Table 1, and in case that there was extra than 1 web-site that met all criteria, the Appropriateness Assessment depending on a scoring board technique (Table 2) would define the final selected web page. The scoring board method assessed the web-sites that continued till this second level of evaluation using a scale from 1 to five, where 1 would indicate the significantly less appropriate and 5 the most appropriate in terms of appropriateness. Within the finish, the site using the highest score could be selected as the pilot site. This two-step elimination method guarantees that the MNITMT Epigenetic Reader Domain result is as objective, comprehensive, and inclusive as possible. When applying this methodology inside the context from the MeDryDive project, every single project partner provided the info and outcomes for the web sites in their Fmoc-Gly-Gly-OH In Vitro respective nations.Heritage 2021,Table two. The scoring board that was utilized for the Appropriateness Assessment within the selection method (own elaboration). 1 (Significantly less Suitable) Touristic possible (Other activities and attractions) Human Capital for the development of cultural tourism Stakeholders’ engagement Uniqueness from the internet site two three 4 5 (More Suitable)3. Benefits 3.1. The Case Studies Briefly Examined At first, for every single country/case there was a list made with all the UCH sites that were accessible determined by the national legislative framework. Then, every site around the list was assessed in accordance with the crucial criteria table (Table 1), and in case there was extra than 1 website that met all critical criteria, the scoring board method using the noncritical/complementary criteria was applied on a second level of assessment (Table 2). three.1.1. Greece As outlined by the legislative framework of Greece [170], you’ll find 12 declared AUCHS, and they’re displayed in Table three beneath:Table three. List in the AUCHS in Greece (personal elaboration). a/a 1 2 Name Peristera Kikinthos Location North Sporades, Alonissos West Pagasetic Gulf Dating Last quarter of the 5th cent. B.C Byzantine times: 12th3th cent. AD (1) Hellenistic period (3rdnd cent. BC), (2) Early Roman period (1stnd cent. AD) (3) Middle and Late Byzantine instances (12th3th cent. AD) 4th cent. AD Hellenistic Classical Byzantine Classical 2nd cent. AD 1st cent. AD Mid- Hellenistic- Post Roman era Locate Shipwreck Shipwreck Attainable several remains of Shipwrecks. Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck ShipwrecksCape GlarosWest Pagasetic Gulf4 five six 7 8 9 10 11Cape Telegrafos Tselios Skantzoura Ag. Petros Fagrou Methoni Sarcophagi Methoni columns Lavreotiki MakronisosWest Pagasetic Gulf North Sporades North Sporades North Sporades North Sporades Peloponnese Peloponnese Attica AtticaThe 12 AUCHS had been topic for the initial amount of elimination assessment depending on the important criteria, as noticed in Table four under. As clearly shown on Table 4, there was only one particular internet site that met all of the criteria, and as a result the second-level assessment procedure was not required. As a result, the site that was selected in Greece.