Ticularly for LL mortars. Relating to the ternary binary binders, particularly for mortars. Regarding the ternary age had been noted binders (SL, SF, and FL series), they presented slight reduced depths than binary ones. series), they presented slight reduced depths than binary ones. binders (SL, SF, and 3.six. Mechanical Strengthsn front depth, mm5250dThe compressive strength outcomes are depicted in Ethyl Vanillate Epigenetics Figure 7. This parameter was reduced Carbonation front depth for the mortars with additions at 28 days in comparison with REF specimens. With respect to the binders with active additions, the highest compressive strength within the quick term 250d was observed for SF mortars, whereas this parameter was barely decrease for S, F, and SL 250d 250d series, followed by FL ones. At 28 days, the smallest compressive strength corresponded to250d 250d 250d28dREF L S F SL SF FLFigure five. Steady-state chloride diffusion coefficient outcomes obtained for the analyzed mortars.Materials 2021, 14,3.5. Carbonation Front Depth9 ofThe depths of carbonation front obtained for the studied binders are represented in Figure 6. Reference mortars showed the lowest carbonation front depths at 28 days, followed by Between 28 and these depths have been higher for the decreased for the REF and L mortars. S ones, whereas 250 days, the compressive strengthother binders studied, but L with even though for binders with at them. From 28 addition, it the carbonation depths inseries,slight differences involving least one activeto 250 days, remainedpractically constant creased for all FL series) or even increased (F series). The S, was once more lower for REF (S, SL, SF, along with the analyzed mortars. At 250 days, this parameterF, and SF mortars showed series, in comparison to the binders with additions. The highest carbonation Nevertheless, very equivalent compressive strength at 250 days in comparison to REF mortars. depths at that at age were noted for the binary binders, especially for L mortars. Relating to the ternary the abovementioned age, the ternary binders with limestone (SL and FL series) had reduce binders (SL, SF, and FL series), even though their compressive strength was higher than that values than reference mortars, they presented slight decrease depths than binary ones. observed for the binary binder with only limestone as addition (L series).Materials 2021, 14,Carbonation front depth10 ofCarbonation front depth, mm5250d3.six. Mechanical Strengths250d250d250d250d3 two 1REF28dFigure 6. Carbonation front depths observed at 28 and 250 days for the characterized binders. Figure six. Carbonation front depths observed at 28 and 250 days for the characterized binders.The compressive strength results are depicted in Figure 7. This parameter was decrease 250d for the mortars with additions at 28 days in comparison with REF specimens. With re250d spect to the binders with active additions, the highest compressive strength within the short term was observed for SF mortars, whereas this parameter was barely reduce for S, F, and SL series, followed by FL ones. At 28 days, the smallest compressive strength corre28d 28d 28d sponded to L mortars. Between 28 and 250 days, the compressive strength decreased for 28d the REF and L series, although for binders with at the very least one particular active addition, it re28d mainedpractically constant (S, SL, SF, and FL series) and even enhanced (F series). The S, F, 28d and SF mortars showed Bomedemstat MedChemExpress incredibly similar compressive strength at 250 days compared to REF mortars. Nevertheless, in the abovementioned age, the ternary binders with lim.