Number who posted tweets. However,whereas the tweeps posting tweets have been responsible for tweets in total,the tweeps posting or much more tweets had been responsible for tweets ( with the total variety of tweets harvested during this study). An examination of your conferences at which someone posted or far more tweets containing the ON123300 web conference hashtag highlights a clear distinction amongst AstroParticle and Other people. If a single ignores conferences with no Twitter activity,then of AstroParticle conferences ( of attracted at the very least one particular such hugely Twitteractive account. The equivalent figure for Others was ( of. As a result,where Twitter is utilised at all,Astro Particle conferences are twice as most likely as Others to possess an individual posting or much more tweets applying the conference hashtag. A total of tweeps posted or extra tweets containing an AstroParticle conference hashtag. (This figure of accounts is equivalent to . from the total number of delegates at AstroParticle conferences exactly where Twitter was used). For Other individuals,tweeps (equivalent to . on the total number of delegates) posted or much more tweets. An analysis of tweet content and public user profiles was then employed to PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21666516 identify regardless of whether these hugely active users have been in fact conference attendees or have been merely retweeting content material from a distance. In the active AstroParticle tweeps,were people with an interest in science but who had been not conference delegates; these individuals had been accountable for a total of retweets. The remaining highly active accounts were all conference attendees; this equates to . of AstroParticle conference delegates. Of these accounts,had been organizational in nature (conference organisers,collaborative experiments,and so on); accounts belonged to named person scientists. As a result . of individual AstroParticle delegates had been highly Twitteractive at conferences. From the active tweeps identified from Other conferences,3 (two news organisations and a single person) were retweeting from outside the conference; they were responsible for a total of retweets. The remaining highly active accounts have been all conference attendees; this equates to . of Other conference delegates. Of theseScientometrics :accounts,have been organizational in nature; accounts belonged to named individual scientists. Therefore . of person delegates have been highly Twitteractive at Other conferences. There is an order of magnitude difference inside the percentage of AstroParticle as well as other conference delegates posting or extra tweets employing the conference hashtag vs A additional analysis of your dataset showed that delegates posted or a lot more tweets during a conference,and all attended PACS conferences. These Twitter accounts posted a total of tweets and retweets containing a conference hashtag,which can be from the total quantity of tweets harvested in this study and is similar in magnitude for the complete Twitter output in the Other conferences. This observation provokes the query of no matter if a little variety of very active Twitter customers might on their own generate the observed differences involving AstroParticle as well as other conferences. If 1 repeats the earlier evaluation then,right after removing all information pertaining to accounts that posted or additional tweets,the variations involving AstroParticle and other conferences are indeed lessened. Even so,the variations are certainly not entirely eliminated. One example is,when it comes to tweet price,AstroParticle accounted for in the most Twitteractive conferences. When all conferences are regarded the median tweet price for Astro : Particle conference.