Was . . minutes for FUSE and . . minutes for FVE (P). Withdrawal occasions had been . minutes and . minutes for FUSE and FVE,respectively (p). Total examination time was . . minutes inside the FUSE group and . minutes in the FVE group (p). Sedation was much less necessary inside the FUSE group as in comparison with FVE (imply propofol dosage,mg vs. mg). Substantially more individuals needed analgesia in the FVE group (meperidine; P). Patient and endoscopists satisfaction have been higher all through the situations and not diverse involving both groups. Polyps have been detected in and of sufferers within the FUSE and FVE group,respectively. Conclusion: Advancement occasions of the scope to the cecum and withdrawal occasions have been quicker together with the FUSE scope as in comparison to common FVE. Satisfaction rates of sufferers and endoscopists have been equivalent in each groups though individuals needed much more sedation and analgesia within the FVE group. Even though a lot more polyps have been located in the FUSE group the study was not developed to evaluate adenoma detection prices among both groups. Disclosure of Interest: None declaredP Danger Factors FOR POSTPOLYPECTOMY BLEEDING AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH HEPARIN BRIDGE THERAPY H. Ishigami,M. Arai,K. Okimoto,D. Maruoka,,T. Matsumura,T. Nakagawa,T. Katsuno,O. Yokosuka Gastroenterology and Nephrology,Graduate School of Medicine,Chiba University,Clinical Analysis Center,Chiba University Hospital,Chiba,Japan Make contact with E-mail Address: thegodofstonenifty Introduction: Postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) is the most common complication of colonic polypectomy. The risk of PPB is linked with increasing age,anticoagulation therapy,hypertension,substantial polyp size,proximal place,and polyp morphology. As outlined by American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and Japanese Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JSGE) recommendations,for sufferers taking anticoagulants (e.g. warfarin),bridge therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is advisable to cut down the threat of thromboembolic events during highrisk procedures like polypectomy. Having said that,small is identified regarding the risk of PPB with heparin bridge (HB) therapy. We investigated the association between HB therapy and PPB. Aims Solutions: We retrospectively reviewed polypectomies performed on patients from January to December at our institution. A total of patients didn’t take any antithrombotic agents (control group),and individuals underwent colonic polypectomy while receiving HB therapy (HB group). We analyzed the threat variables for PPB related to each the sufferers and the polyps,and we determined the price of PPB in the HB group. Final results: PPB occurred in lesions of sufferers ( Methyl linolenate Eleven of PPB patients were in the HB group (p),plus the incidence of PPB in the HB group was . ( of patients). Polyp size ^ mm ( of [. ] vs. of [. ],p),pedunculated polyps ( of [. ] vs. of [. ],p),and place in the cecum ( of [. ] vs. of [. ],p) had been considerable danger components for PPB. Inside the control group,size ^ mm,pedunculated polyps,and place within the cecum have been also important PPB threat aspects (p p and p respectively),despite the fact that in the HB group,these had been not important PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19389808 (p p and p respectively). PPB in smaller polyps (^ mm) was greater in the HB group ,of lesions) than in the manage group ,of lesions) (p),as was the recurrent bleeding rate [ of patients] vs [ of patients],respectively) (p). Conclusion: HB therapy,polyp size ^ mm,pedunculated polyps,and location in the cecum are threat factors for PPB. The incidence of PPB was larger in t.