He current situation often in the Quinagolide (hydrochloride) custom synthesis presence of their trainees, so much so that many seem to think that quenching the fire inside developing Chaetocin cancer scientists is part of their job description. Such negativity may reflect reality, but mentors must resist the temptation to extinguish the hopes and dreams of their trainees. Intelligent trainees with creativity and enthusiasm are going to eventually succeed in some endeavor. We need this endeavor to be toxicology. Thus, while the basic biomedical scientist certainly has fewer Necrostatin-1MedChemExpress Necrostatin-1 opportunities than in the past, the field of toxicology has had and continues to have much more to offer. We still have the basic research positions in academia, but there are also numerous opportunities in government and the private sector (even though these entities are also suffering from shrinking budgets and reduced investment in research). The need for toxicology is not shrinking. Even if we think the support for these needs is lagging, we must remain competitive for the scarce resources. Yes, the environment now is different than when many of us were in school, but all hope is not lost.We must equip our trainees to succeed in the evolving scientific landscape. I have taken the Editorial liberty of offering some unsolicited advice to my captive audience designed to abate the crisis.TO THE MENTORS1. Support the future success of traineesIf programs are not convinced that their graduates will benefit from a graduate degree, either by finding a job or gaining knowledge that allows them to pursue their desires, then we need to stop VER-52296 dose admitting them. Reducing the number of incoming students may be a necessary step to strengthen the training we are providing. However, I am firmly of the belief that once we make a commitment to a new doctoral student we must back them 100 . Admitting students to a program and subsequently telling them that the future is bleak is not only disingenuous, it is unethical. If that is truly the belief of the faculty then the program should close and stop admitting students today. Certainly, most faculty members want their incoming students to not just succeed, but also to thrive. While it may seem trivial, the first critical step is to cultivate in the students a mindset that will allow for success. Students must see that there is a future for them. Preparing students for greatness is a far better strategy than preparing them for failure. While neither strategy may achieve the intended goal, both will succeed to some degree. It may only take a few of the properly prepared trainees to revolutionize the field, but if they aren’t in the field it won’t happen. Thus, it is necessary for us to inspire our trainees to envision a future in which toxicology is innovative, robust, and essential. After which, we give them the tools that they need to seize future opportunities. It is also crucial for the academic mentor to be able to provide or find guidance on careers outside of academia as these can be attractive career options for their trainees. Again, we must train them in cutting-edge techniques and approaches, even if they are outside of our area of expertise. The world in which science is conducted is changing. Basic principles of cause and effect and hypothesis testing still remain,C V The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology.All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]|but we must encourage our trainees to en.He current situation often in the presence of their trainees, so much so that many seem to think that quenching the fire inside developing scientists is part of their job description. Such negativity may reflect reality, but mentors must resist the temptation to extinguish the hopes and dreams of their trainees. Intelligent trainees with creativity and enthusiasm are going to eventually succeed in some endeavor. We need this endeavor to be toxicology. Thus, while the basic biomedical scientist certainly has fewer opportunities than in the past, the field of toxicology has had and continues to have much more to offer. We still have the basic research positions in academia, but there are also numerous opportunities in government and the private sector (even though these entities are also suffering from shrinking budgets and reduced investment in research). The need for toxicology is not shrinking. Even if we think the support for these needs is lagging, we must remain competitive for the scarce resources. Yes, the environment now is different than when many of us were in school, but all hope is not lost.We must equip our trainees to succeed in the evolving scientific landscape. I have taken the Editorial liberty of offering some unsolicited advice to my captive audience designed to abate the crisis.TO THE MENTORS1. Support the future success of traineesIf programs are not convinced that their graduates will benefit from a graduate degree, either by finding a job or gaining knowledge that allows them to pursue their desires, then we need to stop admitting them. Reducing the number of incoming students may be a necessary step to strengthen the training we are providing. However, I am firmly of the belief that once we make a commitment to a new doctoral student we must back them 100 . Admitting students to a program and subsequently telling them that the future is bleak is not only disingenuous, it is unethical. If that is truly the belief of the faculty then the program should close and stop admitting students today. Certainly, most faculty members want their incoming students to not just succeed, but also to thrive. While it may seem trivial, the first critical step is to cultivate in the students a mindset that will allow for success. Students must see that there is a future for them. Preparing students for greatness is a far better strategy than preparing them for failure. While neither strategy may achieve the intended goal, both will succeed to some degree. It may only take a few of the properly prepared trainees to revolutionize the field, but if they aren’t in the field it won’t happen. Thus, it is necessary for us to inspire our trainees to envision a future in which toxicology is innovative, robust, and essential. After which, we give them the tools that they need to seize future opportunities. It is also crucial for the academic mentor to be able to provide or find guidance on careers outside of academia as these can be attractive career options for their trainees. Again, we must train them in cutting-edge techniques and approaches, even if they are outside of our area of expertise. The world in which science is conducted is changing. Basic principles of cause and effect and hypothesis testing still remain,C V The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology.All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]|but we must encourage our trainees to en.He current situation often in the presence of their trainees, so much so that many seem to think that quenching the fire inside developing scientists is part of their job description. Such negativity may reflect reality, but mentors must resist the temptation to extinguish the hopes and dreams of their trainees. Intelligent trainees with creativity and enthusiasm are going to eventually succeed in some endeavor. We need this endeavor to be toxicology. Thus, while the basic biomedical scientist certainly has fewer opportunities than in the past, the field of toxicology has had and continues to have much more to offer. We still have the basic research positions in academia, but there are also numerous opportunities in government and the private sector (even though these entities are also suffering from shrinking budgets and reduced investment in research). The need for toxicology is not shrinking. Even if we think the support for these needs is lagging, we must remain competitive for the scarce resources. Yes, the environment now is different than when many of us were in school, but all hope is not lost.We must equip our trainees to succeed in the evolving scientific landscape. I have taken the Editorial liberty of offering some unsolicited advice to my captive audience designed to abate the crisis.TO THE MENTORS1. Support the future success of traineesIf programs are not convinced that their graduates will benefit from a graduate degree, either by finding a job or gaining knowledge that allows them to pursue their desires, then we need to stop admitting them. Reducing the number of incoming students may be a necessary step to strengthen the training we are providing. However, I am firmly of the belief that once we make a commitment to a new doctoral student we must back them 100 . Admitting students to a program and subsequently telling them that the future is bleak is not only disingenuous, it is unethical. If that is truly the belief of the faculty then the program should close and stop admitting students today. Certainly, most faculty members want their incoming students to not just succeed, but also to thrive. While it may seem trivial, the first critical step is to cultivate in the students a mindset that will allow for success. Students must see that there is a future for them. Preparing students for greatness is a far better strategy than preparing them for failure. While neither strategy may achieve the intended goal, both will succeed to some degree. It may only take a few of the properly prepared trainees to revolutionize the field, but if they aren’t in the field it won’t happen. Thus, it is necessary for us to inspire our trainees to envision a future in which toxicology is innovative, robust, and essential. After which, we give them the tools that they need to seize future opportunities. It is also crucial for the academic mentor to be able to provide or find guidance on careers outside of academia as these can be attractive career options for their trainees. Again, we must train them in cutting-edge techniques and approaches, even if they are outside of our area of expertise. The world in which science is conducted is changing. Basic principles of cause and effect and hypothesis testing still remain,C V The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology.All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]|but we must encourage our trainees to en.He current situation often in the presence of their trainees, so much so that many seem to think that quenching the fire inside developing scientists is part of their job description. Such negativity may reflect reality, but mentors must resist the temptation to extinguish the hopes and dreams of their trainees. Intelligent trainees with creativity and enthusiasm are going to eventually succeed in some endeavor. We need this endeavor to be toxicology. Thus, while the basic biomedical scientist certainly has fewer opportunities than in the past, the field of toxicology has had and continues to have much more to offer. We still have the basic research positions in academia, but there are also numerous opportunities in government and the private sector (even though these entities are also suffering from shrinking budgets and reduced investment in research). The need for toxicology is not shrinking. Even if we think the support for these needs is lagging, we must remain competitive for the scarce resources. Yes, the environment now is different than when many of us were in school, but all hope is not lost.We must equip our trainees to succeed in the evolving scientific landscape. I have taken the Editorial liberty of offering some unsolicited advice to my captive audience designed to abate the crisis.TO THE MENTORS1. Support the future success of traineesIf programs are not convinced that their graduates will benefit from a graduate degree, either by finding a job or gaining knowledge that allows them to pursue their desires, then we need to stop admitting them. Reducing the number of incoming students may be a necessary step to strengthen the training we are providing. However, I am firmly of the belief that once we make a commitment to a new doctoral student we must back them 100 . Admitting students to a program and subsequently telling them that the future is bleak is not only disingenuous, it is unethical. If that is truly the belief of the faculty then the program should close and stop admitting students today. Certainly, most faculty members want their incoming students to not just succeed, but also to thrive. While it may seem trivial, the first critical step is to cultivate in the students a mindset that will allow for success. Students must see that there is a future for them. Preparing students for greatness is a far better strategy than preparing them for failure. While neither strategy may achieve the intended goal, both will succeed to some degree. It may only take a few of the properly prepared trainees to revolutionize the field, but if they aren’t in the field it won’t happen. Thus, it is necessary for us to inspire our trainees to envision a future in which toxicology is innovative, robust, and essential. After which, we give them the tools that they need to seize future opportunities. It is also crucial for the academic mentor to be able to provide or find guidance on careers outside of academia as these can be attractive career options for their trainees. Again, we must train them in cutting-edge techniques and approaches, even if they are outside of our area of expertise. The world in which science is conducted is changing. Basic principles of cause and effect and hypothesis testing still remain,C V The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology.All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]|but we must encourage our trainees to en.