S such as histone-modifying enzymes and promote different biological outcomes for the DNA linked to this Homatropine (methylbromide) custom synthesis chromatin region. Different histone phosphorylation binding modules such as 14-3-3 and BRCT are known. The 14-3-3 proteins have been reported to bind histone H3 phosphorylated at Ser-10 and/or Ser-28 residues. They have been implicated in diverse roles of regulating chromatin remodeling, transcription activation and hence gene regulation, though the exact mechanism behind these function remains elusive (reviewed in [16]). Based on our finding of frequent histone phosphorylation in P. falciparum, we searched for plasmodial proteins containing 14-3-3 domains, which have been reported to bind histone H3 phosphorylated at Ser-10 and/or Ser28 residues. Two putative 14-3-3 proteins are highly expressed during the asexual parasite cycle [47,48]. CAL-120 sequence alignment of these proteins to 14-3-3 proteins from other model organismsindicated conservation of residues important for the interaction of these proteins with phosphorylated proteins or peptides. Residues responsible for dimer formation are also completely conserved for Pf14-3-3I, but only partially conserved for Pf14-3-3II (Figure 3) [44,49]. We also detected H3S10ph and H3S28ph modifications in our purified samples. Hence, we produced GST-tagged recombinant versions of these two putative parasite 14-3-3 proteins, which we named Pf14-3-3I and Pf14-3-3II, to analyse their histone binding properties. In an ELISA-based binding assay, both of these proteins bound purified parasite histones, with 14-3-3I binding distinctively to the H3S28ph peptide, and not the H3S10ph peptide, demonstrating selectivity for one phospho-mark over the other. The canonical 14-3-3 binding motif includes a proline residue at position P+2 from the phosphoserine [35,37]. This proline introduces a turn in the phosphopeptide that allows the remaining 16574785 protein to exit the 14-3-3 binding pocket [50]. Both P. falciparum histone H3.1 and H3.3 have a proline at P+2 after S28, the canonical 14-3-3 binding motif. Conversely, P. falciparum histone H3.1 and H3.3 contain motifs ARKSTAG and ARKSTGG, respectively, in the vicinity of S10. The GG sequence in H3.3 could allow such a turn but the AG sequence in H3.1 might not allow a similar degree of flexibility. The differences in these potential 14-3-3 binding motifs might explain the differential Pf14-3-3 histone/peptide binding results. In yeast, 14-3-3 proteins preferentially recognize H3S10phK14ac over H3S10ph [39], demonstrating how neighbouring modifications can affect binding of these proteins. Hence, we tested neighbourhood effect by including dually modified peptides H3S10phK14ac and H3S28phS32ph in the study. Recombinant 14-3-3I clearly bound H3S28phS32ph peptide but did not bind to H3S10phK14ac peptide in 1527786 our in vitro studies. This demonstrated that neighbouring modifications did not affect the binding pattern of the protein. However, even though Pf14-3-3II bound purified parasite histones, it did not preferentially bind to any of the H3 peptides included in this study, while demonstrating low level of binding to all the peptides. This leads us to speculate that Pf14-3-3II might be recognizing some specific combination of modifications retained in purified parasite histones that are not represented in our synthetic peptides. Alternatively, as the residues responsible for dimer formation are only partially conserved for Pf14-3-3II it remains possible that this protein fun.S such as histone-modifying enzymes and promote different biological outcomes for the DNA linked to this chromatin region. Different histone phosphorylation binding modules such as 14-3-3 and BRCT are known. The 14-3-3 proteins have been reported to bind histone H3 phosphorylated at Ser-10 and/or Ser-28 residues. They have been implicated in diverse roles of regulating chromatin remodeling, transcription activation and hence gene regulation, though the exact mechanism behind these function remains elusive (reviewed in [16]). Based on our finding of frequent histone phosphorylation in P. falciparum, we searched for plasmodial proteins containing 14-3-3 domains, which have been reported to bind histone H3 phosphorylated at Ser-10 and/or Ser28 residues. Two putative 14-3-3 proteins are highly expressed during the asexual parasite cycle [47,48]. Sequence alignment of these proteins to 14-3-3 proteins from other model organismsindicated conservation of residues important for the interaction of these proteins with phosphorylated proteins or peptides. Residues responsible for dimer formation are also completely conserved for Pf14-3-3I, but only partially conserved for Pf14-3-3II (Figure 3) [44,49]. We also detected H3S10ph and H3S28ph modifications in our purified samples. Hence, we produced GST-tagged recombinant versions of these two putative parasite 14-3-3 proteins, which we named Pf14-3-3I and Pf14-3-3II, to analyse their histone binding properties. In an ELISA-based binding assay, both of these proteins bound purified parasite histones, with 14-3-3I binding distinctively to the H3S28ph peptide, and not the H3S10ph peptide, demonstrating selectivity for one phospho-mark over the other. The canonical 14-3-3 binding motif includes a proline residue at position P+2 from the phosphoserine [35,37]. This proline introduces a turn in the phosphopeptide that allows the remaining 16574785 protein to exit the 14-3-3 binding pocket [50]. Both P. falciparum histone H3.1 and H3.3 have a proline at P+2 after S28, the canonical 14-3-3 binding motif. Conversely, P. falciparum histone H3.1 and H3.3 contain motifs ARKSTAG and ARKSTGG, respectively, in the vicinity of S10. The GG sequence in H3.3 could allow such a turn but the AG sequence in H3.1 might not allow a similar degree of flexibility. The differences in these potential 14-3-3 binding motifs might explain the differential Pf14-3-3 histone/peptide binding results. In yeast, 14-3-3 proteins preferentially recognize H3S10phK14ac over H3S10ph [39], demonstrating how neighbouring modifications can affect binding of these proteins. Hence, we tested neighbourhood effect by including dually modified peptides H3S10phK14ac and H3S28phS32ph in the study. Recombinant 14-3-3I clearly bound H3S28phS32ph peptide but did not bind to H3S10phK14ac peptide in 1527786 our in vitro studies. This demonstrated that neighbouring modifications did not affect the binding pattern of the protein. However, even though Pf14-3-3II bound purified parasite histones, it did not preferentially bind to any of the H3 peptides included in this study, while demonstrating low level of binding to all the peptides. This leads us to speculate that Pf14-3-3II might be recognizing some specific combination of modifications retained in purified parasite histones that are not represented in our synthetic peptides. Alternatively, as the residues responsible for dimer formation are only partially conserved for Pf14-3-3II it remains possible that this protein fun.