D difference in concentration could be picked up by the cGMP assay indicates that a more sensitive technique may be needed to resolve this discrepancy. The second method used to investigate the inhibitory effect of CD-NP on HCF was by means of elucidating amount of DNA synthesis in HCF as a Ntrol (arrows) Sections on the right (iii, vi, ix) represent negative consequence of the presence of CD-NP. DNA synthesis of HCF was suppressed in presence of CD-NP. The suppression was independent of dose (37 mg/mL, 0.37 mg/ mL and 0.0037 mg/mL) for the first 3 days of daily dose. However, by the 5th day, 0.37 mg/mL and 0.0037 mg/mL were rendered ineffective in inhibiting the DNA synthesis of HCF. This observation suggests that long-term dose responsiveness differsfrom short-term dose responsiveness, which maybe associated to the interdependence of GC receptor pathways and NP Title Loaded From File exposure [30,39]. The suppression of DNA synthesis was observed from CD-NP releasing films only for the first 2 days. The absence of suppression on the 5th day was expected as the critical dose was not met. However, the lack of DNA suppression on the 3rd day was unexpected. Since the CD-NP released from the films was within the working range (0.0037 mg/mL to 37 mg/mL). Two hypotheses to explain this observation are proposed here. Firstly, the lack of DNA synthesis suppression could be attributed to the different types of exogenous CD-NP profiles. The daily dosing of CD-NP has an “On-off” (bolus) profile (figure 6), whilst film release had an `on’ profile throughout the entire duration. These two distinct profiles may elicit different cascading modes and biological responses; N-Meier survival curves of aged Cc1-Cre KrasG12D mice and resulting in different DNA synthesis behaviour. The second explanation is that the encapsulated CD-NP had become less potent. 1315463 Although this is undesirable, it may be inevitable due to the manufacturing processes [38,40]. The xCELLigence method is unable to differentiate whether hypertrophic or hyperplasia HCF was inhibited. On the other hand, the inhibition of HCF cell hyperplasia was determined by the DNA synthesis study. When we correlate both data, we observed that when CD-NP suppressed DNA synthesis, similar inhibition of HCF was not observed in the xCELLigence experiment and vice versa. This suggests that the inhibition observed in xCELLigence is dominantly the inhibition of hypertrophic HCF cells. From the CD-NP released from films 1 and 3, continuous inhibition of HCF was observed from xCELLigence despite the disappearance of DNA synthesis suppression by the third day. This means that continuous supply of CD-NP eluting from films were more effective in inhibiting hypertrophic HCF compared to “on-off” profile of daily dose of CD-NP.Cenderitide-Eluting FilmPost infarct LV remodelling could be broadly divided into the early phase and late phase. Early phase remodelling occurs within the first 72 hours and dominantly involves the expansion of the infarct zone [6]. During this phase, if the secretion of modified extracellular matrix collagen by activated Title Loaded From File fibroblast is not halt, the transition of granulation tissue to scar tissue becomes permanent. From our study, films 1 and 3 exhibited early inhibition on hypertrophic HCF compared to film 2. Hence, films 1 and 3 could be considered in further studies for tackling early phase remodelling. However, further long-term investigation needs to be carried out if late phase remodelling is considered; this is because more complicated factors including the decrease in collagenase activity and upregulation in the secretion of coll.D difference in concentration could be picked up by the cGMP assay indicates that a more sensitive technique may be needed to resolve this discrepancy. The second method used to investigate the inhibitory effect of CD-NP on HCF was by means of elucidating amount of DNA synthesis in HCF as a consequence of the presence of CD-NP. DNA synthesis of HCF was suppressed in presence of CD-NP. The suppression was independent of dose (37 mg/mL, 0.37 mg/ mL and 0.0037 mg/mL) for the first 3 days of daily dose. However, by the 5th day, 0.37 mg/mL and 0.0037 mg/mL were rendered ineffective in inhibiting the DNA synthesis of HCF. This observation suggests that long-term dose responsiveness differsfrom short-term dose responsiveness, which maybe associated to the interdependence of GC receptor pathways and NP exposure [30,39]. The suppression of DNA synthesis was observed from CD-NP releasing films only for the first 2 days. The absence of suppression on the 5th day was expected as the critical dose was not met. However, the lack of DNA suppression on the 3rd day was unexpected. Since the CD-NP released from the films was within the working range (0.0037 mg/mL to 37 mg/mL). Two hypotheses to explain this observation are proposed here. Firstly, the lack of DNA synthesis suppression could be attributed to the different types of exogenous CD-NP profiles. The daily dosing of CD-NP has an “On-off” (bolus) profile (figure 6), whilst film release had an `on’ profile throughout the entire duration. These two distinct profiles may elicit different cascading modes and biological responses; resulting in different DNA synthesis behaviour. The second explanation is that the encapsulated CD-NP had become less potent. 1315463 Although this is undesirable, it may be inevitable due to the manufacturing processes [38,40]. The xCELLigence method is unable to differentiate whether hypertrophic or hyperplasia HCF was inhibited. On the other hand, the inhibition of HCF cell hyperplasia was determined by the DNA synthesis study. When we correlate both data, we observed that when CD-NP suppressed DNA synthesis, similar inhibition of HCF was not observed in the xCELLigence experiment and vice versa. This suggests that the inhibition observed in xCELLigence is dominantly the inhibition of hypertrophic HCF cells. From the CD-NP released from films 1 and 3, continuous inhibition of HCF was observed from xCELLigence despite the disappearance of DNA synthesis suppression by the third day. This means that continuous supply of CD-NP eluting from films were more effective in inhibiting hypertrophic HCF compared to “on-off” profile of daily dose of CD-NP.Cenderitide-Eluting FilmPost infarct LV remodelling could be broadly divided into the early phase and late phase. Early phase remodelling occurs within the first 72 hours and dominantly involves the expansion of the infarct zone [6]. During this phase, if the secretion of modified extracellular matrix collagen by activated fibroblast is not halt, the transition of granulation tissue to scar tissue becomes permanent. From our study, films 1 and 3 exhibited early inhibition on hypertrophic HCF compared to film 2. Hence, films 1 and 3 could be considered in further studies for tackling early phase remodelling. However, further long-term investigation needs to be carried out if late phase remodelling is considered; this is because more complicated factors including the decrease in collagenase activity and upregulation in the secretion of coll.D difference in concentration could be picked up by the cGMP assay indicates that a more sensitive technique may be needed to resolve this discrepancy. The second method used to investigate the inhibitory effect of CD-NP on HCF was by means of elucidating amount of DNA synthesis in HCF as a consequence of the presence of CD-NP. DNA synthesis of HCF was suppressed in presence of CD-NP. The suppression was independent of dose (37 mg/mL, 0.37 mg/ mL and 0.0037 mg/mL) for the first 3 days of daily dose. However, by the 5th day, 0.37 mg/mL and 0.0037 mg/mL were rendered ineffective in inhibiting the DNA synthesis of HCF. This observation suggests that long-term dose responsiveness differsfrom short-term dose responsiveness, which maybe associated to the interdependence of GC receptor pathways and NP exposure [30,39]. The suppression of DNA synthesis was observed from CD-NP releasing films only for the first 2 days. The absence of suppression on the 5th day was expected as the critical dose was not met. However, the lack of DNA suppression on the 3rd day was unexpected. Since the CD-NP released from the films was within the working range (0.0037 mg/mL to 37 mg/mL). Two hypotheses to explain this observation are proposed here. Firstly, the lack of DNA synthesis suppression could be attributed to the different types of exogenous CD-NP profiles. The daily dosing of CD-NP has an “On-off” (bolus) profile (figure 6), whilst film release had an `on’ profile throughout the entire duration. These two distinct profiles may elicit different cascading modes and biological responses; resulting in different DNA synthesis behaviour. The second explanation is that the encapsulated CD-NP had become less potent. 1315463 Although this is undesirable, it may be inevitable due to the manufacturing processes [38,40]. The xCELLigence method is unable to differentiate whether hypertrophic or hyperplasia HCF was inhibited. On the other hand, the inhibition of HCF cell hyperplasia was determined by the DNA synthesis study. When we correlate both data, we observed that when CD-NP suppressed DNA synthesis, similar inhibition of HCF was not observed in the xCELLigence experiment and vice versa. This suggests that the inhibition observed in xCELLigence is dominantly the inhibition of hypertrophic HCF cells. From the CD-NP released from films 1 and 3, continuous inhibition of HCF was observed from xCELLigence despite the disappearance of DNA synthesis suppression by the third day. This means that continuous supply of CD-NP eluting from films were more effective in inhibiting hypertrophic HCF compared to “on-off” profile of daily dose of CD-NP.Cenderitide-Eluting FilmPost infarct LV remodelling could be broadly divided into the early phase and late phase. Early phase remodelling occurs within the first 72 hours and dominantly involves the expansion of the infarct zone [6]. During this phase, if the secretion of modified extracellular matrix collagen by activated fibroblast is not halt, the transition of granulation tissue to scar tissue becomes permanent. From our study, films 1 and 3 exhibited early inhibition on hypertrophic HCF compared to film 2. Hence, films 1 and 3 could be considered in further studies for tackling early phase remodelling. However, further long-term investigation needs to be carried out if late phase remodelling is considered; this is because more complicated factors including the decrease in collagenase activity and upregulation in the secretion of coll.D difference in concentration could be picked up by the cGMP assay indicates that a more sensitive technique may be needed to resolve this discrepancy. The second method used to investigate the inhibitory effect of CD-NP on HCF was by means of elucidating amount of DNA synthesis in HCF as a consequence of the presence of CD-NP. DNA synthesis of HCF was suppressed in presence of CD-NP. The suppression was independent of dose (37 mg/mL, 0.37 mg/ mL and 0.0037 mg/mL) for the first 3 days of daily dose. However, by the 5th day, 0.37 mg/mL and 0.0037 mg/mL were rendered ineffective in inhibiting the DNA synthesis of HCF. This observation suggests that long-term dose responsiveness differsfrom short-term dose responsiveness, which maybe associated to the interdependence of GC receptor pathways and NP exposure [30,39]. The suppression of DNA synthesis was observed from CD-NP releasing films only for the first 2 days. The absence of suppression on the 5th day was expected as the critical dose was not met. However, the lack of DNA suppression on the 3rd day was unexpected. Since the CD-NP released from the films was within the working range (0.0037 mg/mL to 37 mg/mL). Two hypotheses to explain this observation are proposed here. Firstly, the lack of DNA synthesis suppression could be attributed to the different types of exogenous CD-NP profiles. The daily dosing of CD-NP has an “On-off” (bolus) profile (figure 6), whilst film release had an `on’ profile throughout the entire duration. These two distinct profiles may elicit different cascading modes and biological responses; resulting in different DNA synthesis behaviour. The second explanation is that the encapsulated CD-NP had become less potent. 1315463 Although this is undesirable, it may be inevitable due to the manufacturing processes [38,40]. The xCELLigence method is unable to differentiate whether hypertrophic or hyperplasia HCF was inhibited. On the other hand, the inhibition of HCF cell hyperplasia was determined by the DNA synthesis study. When we correlate both data, we observed that when CD-NP suppressed DNA synthesis, similar inhibition of HCF was not observed in the xCELLigence experiment and vice versa. This suggests that the inhibition observed in xCELLigence is dominantly the inhibition of hypertrophic HCF cells. From the CD-NP released from films 1 and 3, continuous inhibition of HCF was observed from xCELLigence despite the disappearance of DNA synthesis suppression by the third day. This means that continuous supply of CD-NP eluting from films were more effective in inhibiting hypertrophic HCF compared to “on-off” profile of daily dose of CD-NP.Cenderitide-Eluting FilmPost infarct LV remodelling could be broadly divided into the early phase and late phase. Early phase remodelling occurs within the first 72 hours and dominantly involves the expansion of the infarct zone [6]. During this phase, if the secretion of modified extracellular matrix collagen by activated fibroblast is not halt, the transition of granulation tissue to scar tissue becomes permanent. From our study, films 1 and 3 exhibited early inhibition on hypertrophic HCF compared to film 2. Hence, films 1 and 3 could be considered in further studies for tackling early phase remodelling. However, further long-term investigation needs to be carried out if late phase remodelling is considered; this is because more complicated factors including the decrease in collagenase activity and upregulation in the secretion of coll.